Measurement Stability Troubleshooting Worksheet

Score your measurement stability risk

Check the statements that are true for your current problem. The result is not a formal capability study. It is a practical isolation tool for identifying the first variable to review.

0-3Low signal

4-7Review needed

8-11Systemic risk

12-15High urgency

No contact information is required to calculate your basic score. Submit the form only if you want the full worksheet summary routed for follow-up.

Fixture / part holding

1. Part location or clamp force changes between runs.

2. Datum contacts are difficult to repeat or do not match the print strategy.

3. Part condition, cleanliness, burrs, or seating are not controlled before measurement.

Probe / stylus system

4. Stylus qualification is stale, inconsistent, or not documented.

5. Probe build-up, tip size, extension, or access angle is marginal for the feature.

6. Probe changes happen without a controlled program or report review.

Program / evaluation strategy

7. Alignment, filters, fitting method, or outlier settings are unclear.

8. The report result does not clearly match the decision being made.

9. Program revisions are not controlled or reviewed before production use.

Operator / method

10. Different operators load, clean, align, or run the part differently.

11. Escalation rules are unclear when a result fails.

12. Setup knowledge depends on one person instead of a documented method.

Environment / timing

13. Part, fixture, and machine temperatures are not stabilized before measurement.

14. Measurement timing changes between first piece, production, and recheck.

15. Shop-floor conditions change enough to affect confidence in the result.

Your result

Complete the questions above, then calculate your result. No contact information is required to see your basic score.

-- / 15

Result will appear here.

Your recommendation will appear here.

Highest risk signal: Risk signal will appear here.

Recommended next step: Next step will appear here.

Want the full worksheet summary?

Your basic score appears above after you calculate it. Enter your information only if you want the score summary, highest-risk signal, and recommended next step sent for follow-up.

First name

Last name

Work email

Company

Role / title

Phone

CMM brand

CMM type / model

Measurement software

Software version

What is the biggest measurement stability problem you are dealing with?

You can calculate the basic score without submitting contact information. Submitting this section sends your worksheet summary to Wolf Metrology through Zapier for review and follow-up.

What happens after you submit

You can use the basic score immediately. If you submit your information, Wolf Metrology receives the score, section breakdown, highest-risk signal, and your notes through Zapier.

The worksheet is meant to help determine whether the issue looks like fixture, probe, program, operator, or environment instability before the team makes expensive quality decisions.

Who this is for

This worksheet is for quality, manufacturing, and engineering teams dealing with false rejects, inconsistent results, repeatability problems, fixture drift, operator variation, or unexplained CMM disagreements.

What you’ll receive

Your basic stability risk score immediately
Your highest-risk signal by category
A recommended next step based on the result
A fuller worksheet summary if you submit your information

How to use the result

Use the highest-risk signal as the first review path. Do not chase every variable at once. Start with the category that scored highest, then verify whether the issue repeats across operators, setups, and timing conditions.

When to talk with us

If your result shows systemic risk, the issue is probably not a one-off bad part. A focused troubleshooting review can help isolate the real source before scrap, rework, or customer escalation gets worse.

Talk Through the Result

Find out where unreliable CMM results are most likely coming from.